My blog has moved! Redirecting…

You should be automatically redirected. If not, visit http://www.nomas-nyc.com/scorecard/ and update your bookmarks.

12.09.2007

The Persecution of Floyd Mayweather

I've come to feel that Floyd right now occupies about the same place in the boxing universe that Ali did in the 60's, pre-Vietnam period (keeping in mind that the boxing universe today occupies a considerably diminished space of the cultural stratosphere at large). In this analogy, 50 Cent is Floyd's Malcolm X, which I don't think is a stretch at all. For middle-class white America, hip hop today represents pretty much what the Nation of Islam did in the 60's - black, dangerous, violent, anarchic, contemptuous at every turn of white bourgeois values and proud of that contempt. In fact, hip hop is probably more loathsome and terrifying to the white middle-class now than the Nation was back in the 60's. The Nation was a small fringe movement with little real cultural capital other than its capacity to shock whenever the media gave it a platform, which was rarely. Today, hip hop permeates the bourgeoisie and has become the veritable religion of its children. We must remember that before Vietnam, Ali's only political stance was to associate himself with the Nation, and if we are going to celebrate him solely for that, we are going pretty damn far down the "all things black and militant are cool" hipster road, because the ideology of the Nation makes Mormonism seem like the work of John Locke. I also don't believe that Ali was tremendously concerned with aligning himself with the struggle of his black brothers and sisters - if the man was anything, he was a raving megalomaniac, and the only struggle on his mind was his own. What black nationalism really seemed to provide Ali at a crucial moment of his mega-stardom, and what in retrospect seems brave about his decision to ally with the Nation despite their legitimate nuthood, was a way to signal with extreme authority to the white media and the white fanbase they represented that he would never take instruction from them, that he would never play by their racist rules - that he was his own proud, powerful black man who would never be their "boy." For years after he took his Muslim name, most of the media continued to refer to Ali as "Clay" and the significance of that was plain. Oh no you don't. We won't let you. Of course, there always was something comic and unsettling about Ali's revolutionary self-creation, because that revolution was indeed televised. No other athlete ever has so thrived on, so craved, and so brilliantly manipulated the media's attention. Outside of the Nation conversion and the name-change, the main thing Ali was known for in his prime was talking ridiculous amounts of smack about himself in a manic, clownish fashion, ridiculing his opponents with a genuine sense of humor and theater but also with a pointed cruelty rarely seen before or since, and for calling the rounds in which he would score knockouts and then frequently delivering on his promises. In short, Ali didn't even need the Nation to make him a villain because he was already White America's Darth Vader, the boastful black man that nobody could shut up - in essence The Black Man You Love to Hate. He rode an entire country's outrage straight to the bank, laughing all the way. As I've written before, this is why I'm so offended now by the media's creation of the mute, Parkinsonian Ali as The Black Man We Love to Love. It seems like an almost Soviet-level of historical revisionism, and in my mind it takes considerable edge off of what Ali actually did, what he dared to do, because it makes it seem like we were all behind him all along, rather than telling the truth, which is that most of us (and with "us" here I figuratively address my own demographic - white sports fans, white media) were passionately against him. Most people, I think, are going to be offended that I even begin to compare Floyd to Ali, and on one score I agree that offense is warranted - Floyd's self-creation is in no way as brave or bold as Ali's was, because Ali paved the way before him (and then if you really want to talk bold, there's Jack Johnson... but I digress). But the fact remains that Floyd is a trash-talking egomaniacal loudmouth genius of a boxer defiantly aligned with hip hop and all the dangerous blackness that it represents. The money-flinging, the conspicuous-blinging, and the endless bringing of rhythmic disses and self-mythologizing and preposterous nicknames - to me it is hilarious, playful, pure promotional perpetration that at its best is worthy of The Greatest himself, and yet the media and the fans and just about everybody around seem to revile the guy and all that he represents. There is a wellspring of love out there for "rap," the so-called Ali edition, circa 1963. But in 2007 it's pretty much the same old story when a black athlete takes this guise - how dare he? Watching the fight last night, I felt some shame on this count. Floyd seemed like the loneliest man in the world walking into that ring, and I couldn't help but feel it was simply because, to paraphrase Larry Holmes, he just didn't have the complexion to make the connection. Money May now reigns as The Black Boxer We Love to Hate and I think the word "Black" in that title tells much more of the story than anyone would ever care to admit. If Floyd were white and that were the only difference in this fight, if all the hype was the same, 24/7, etc. - I have no doubt that the terms of the contest and the tenor of the coverage would have been considerably different. There would have been a thunderous uproar of flag-waving fervor when he walked into the ring to "Born in the U.S.A." There would have been violence in the crowd when Hatton's throng of British louts had the predictable class to boo the American national anthem, because the British louts wouldn't have ruled the arena. If Floyd were white, there would have been an overwhelming angle of national conflict to the portrayal of the bout and some genuine national pride in his victory. This would have happened whether he played up that angle or not, and the fact is, he did play up that angle, he did try to identify as an American in the build-up to this fight and did it often. But it didn't take. I wonder why. Back in 1963, Americans hated Cassius Clay so much that they universally rooted for Sonny Liston to defeat him, one of the most genuinely evil human beings prizefighting has ever known. A bad black man, but a quietly bad one, one who seemed to know his place in the world. Somewhere in the distance, Little Johnny Cougar sings "this is our country..." (Thanks to everyone who commented or wrote emails to congratulate me on my successful prognostification. I will sing my own praises a little bit and give a full re-cap of my thoughts on the fight tomorrow - L)

13 Comments:

Blogger Brother Joshua said...

i think you've hit it on the head, large. i'm hearing these stories of people at fight parties where the whole party was rooting for hatton just because he's white. there's some kind of huge difference in a black man being the best at a game like basketball, football, baseball, etc. but when that sport is boxing it's like all our unspoken fright about violent black men comes out. pretty ridiculous.

i'll admit, i was rooting for hatton just because i wanted to see someone so rough do well against a fighter like mayweather, but when you see money may fight like he did last night it's impossible to not think "god damn, this is the baddest man on the planet."

5:49 PM  
Anonymous Guy Manndude said...

Myself I think that the villification of Money May has less to do with his skin color and more to do with him choosing to play the role of the villain (dressing as a gangster on the cover of Ring a while back for example.) Just like Mayorga, he realizes that choosing to make people hate you can be a fun easy promotional tool. But this villainy is very superficial and he doesn't exactly stand for anything anti-white at all. If anything the hip-hop culture as I see it is borgious (sp?) and decadent as anything these days.

Where I watched it (a room full of white people) the only one rooting for Hatton had English ancestry. Money May coming out to Bruce Springsteen and the brits booing the anthem solidified our pro-maywhether sentiment.

If I ever wanted Hatton to do well its because his 'guy in the pub/brawler' image (which you were astute enough to point out is kind of overblown) is better for the sport than Floyd's image. He, like Roy Jones before him seems to like everything about the sport except the boxing and I think he admitted as much in the post-fight interview.

I guess to wrap this rant up my point is that I think the anti-Maywhether sentiment has less to do with race than other factors like his clownish personality.

7:25 PM  
Blogger Large said...

Don't get me wrong, Guy Manndude (hell of a handle there Guy) - it's not that I think hip hop is offering any sort of cultural critique or revolutionary sentiment in and of itself. But whatever you make of its violent, predominantly nihilist black urban ethos - bitches, guns and money (hey... didn't Warren Zevon write that song?) - hip hop does tend to make white middle class people of a certain age very uncomfortable.

7:55 PM  
Blogger Unsilent Majority said...

...and if we are going to celebrate him solely for that, we are going pretty damn far down the "all things black and militant are cool" hipster road, because the ideology of the Nation makes Mormonism seem like the work of John Locke.

That's just fucking awesome.

6:56 AM  
Blogger Kurt said...

I think people don't like Floyd because he plays the heel role to the hilt (both intentionally and unintentionally). I've been around Vegas enough to know that at times, he's acted like a heel with no media around - just kind of an asshole.

Paulie Malingaggi is a white kid who has basically adopted the same persona (in the ring) and I've been in arenas where the chant of "Paulie Sucks" resonated. Most boxing fans aren't into the guys who run, showboat and taunt - be they white, black, hispanic, middle eastern (e.g. - Malignaggi, Camacho, Jr., Hamed). I think that explains a lot of the rancor towards Floyd (though he's obviously much more talented than Paulie or Hector or Naseem) - plus the hangover of the "slave wages" comment and bad breakup with his Dad that tagged him as an ingrate early on in his career.

Floyd is only now starting to "get it". By being more media friendly and making himself more accessible (Al Haymon has him doing a lot of charity work, Dancing With the Stars, 24/7, etc.) - Floyd is now starting to max out his earning potential and transcend the sport a little bit. He was even praising Hatton in the post-fight interview - something he's rarely ever done, he's usually too busy praising himself.

I see where you're going with your argument - white people don't like him because he's "too black, too strong" - and that may be part of it. But Floyd has brought a lot of the animus on himself - with his style and attitude. Hip-hop is as diverse as the people who create it. Floyd is definitely not on the "conscious" or "alternative" side of it - he's into the "commercial gangsta" side of it. That music can be a tad ignorant, racist and sexually exploitative - why should people, white, black or otherwise like it if it's not their cup of tea. I definitely respect his skills - he's the best in the world. But would I like to see Cotto whip his ass - hell yeah.

8:50 AM  
Blogger Tim -- tstarks2@gmail.com said...

Many aspects of your comparison are valid, I think. But the main difference is that Ali's dangerousness was ABOUT something, besides all the bluster; he was political, religious. Perhaps Mayweather's one-dimensional money-harping routine is kind of about something, in the way that hip-hop's money-harping is kind of about something. But it's annoyingly repetitive and shallow. The modern day equivalent to Ali -- although not in the sports world -- is probably more like Kanye West. He, too, is hated by many for his bluster, but more often than not, he brings depth that Ali had and Mayweather apparently does not. Another problem: Mayweather looked GREAT Saturday night, but sometimes he doesn't. How often did Ali fail to put on a good show? It's easier to root for someone under those circumstances, even if there are these other dynamics you speak of.

Also, maybe some of the people who failed to be stirred by "Born in the USA" may have read the lyrics; it's hardly a nationalistic anthem.

9:37 AM  
Blogger Large said...

Tim - One of my points is that I don't think much of Ali's stance at that point, even the Nation conversion (I'm really talking pre-Vietnam here - the war thing complicates everything with Ali), wasn't about anything other than himself. He was young and more in love with himself than anyone perhaps who ever walked the earth. I think he basically got played by Malcolm X, who saw this defiant handsome black man as an excellent advertisement for what he was selling and got him on the team (of course, he had no idea how virulently Ali would drink the Kool-Aid, to the extent of siding with Elijah Muhammad over Malcolm and never really expressing any remorse at Malcolm's murder.)

Ali was not that deep, man. He was smart and funny and the most skillful self-promoter sports has ever known, but deep, no. That's something that we have appended to him in retrospect in the Ali as Icon of 20th Century lovefest.

Ali also had some boring fights and was accused much like Floyd of being a showman who couldn't punch, more sizzle than steak.

I guess my central argument is this - given the parallels that I see, I think that if you feel genuine animus towards Floyd right now, you really have to ask yourself how you would have felt about Ali circa 1964. And as there clearly was for Ali, I think there is a strong racial element to the prevalence of that animus towards Floyd.

9:53 AM  
Blogger C.I. said...

Agree that only a tiny portion of the people who are retrospectively down with the early Ali would have actually been able to embrace him if they had been alive and of age in 1964. I don't think it was just a case of only the Jimmy Cannon type's hating, there were difficult things to digest about his persona for many others.

The lack of humility wasn't just a white complaint either. It's interesting to see in William Klein's The Greatest, how split opinion is between young black people before Liston I. Word to Kurt, not everybody likes a loudmouth braggart whatever their color.

I was thinking about all this based on the way Floyd rubs me, and I think if I had been born at a different time, I might have been rooting for Liston. Hurts me to say, but I think it's true.

10:48 AM  
Blogger Tim -- tstarks2@gmail.com said...

Large: I should say, right off the bat, that I really like your blog.

I saw that point, about thinking that Ali's Nation of Islam stuff was superficial. I suspect you're right in part. But he is still a Muslim, isn't he? I could elaborate, but I think many of his convictions were deeply held.

Is Ali "THAT deep?" Nah. But he's significantly deeper than what we've seen of Mayweather, and I never asserted in my comments that Ali ranks on the all-time scale of deepest men ever. And I don't think you can separate out his Vietnam views from who he was and how it shaped the public view of him. It was very influential -- some positive, some negative.

Your points about rose-colored lenses for Ali is absolutely true. I was completely bewildered that his lighting of the torch at the Olympics was so celebrated. There are a number of things I don't like about Ali, namely the Kool-Aid drinking you mentioned. I think to some degree the reason for this revisionism is as you say: he was silenced.

But I don't think any of my own animosity toward Floyd has a racial element. I can't speak for everyone, of course, and I'm sure some white people don't like Floyd because he's black. The people I talk to don't like Floyd because he comes off as a jerk. It's possible to dislike a fighter and still be a fan of his performances in the ring, as I am of Floyd when he performs well. I find much of what hip-hop has to say trite, but I'm a fan of the music and the wordplay regardless.

Race is one element of why people were rooting for Hatton against Mayeather, I just think others may be stronger. The ones I mentioned, for example.

Other elements to consider: --Inherent ethnic support of fighters (Mexican-Americans tend to support Mexican-American fighters, for instance).
--Ali's mostly-warm relationship with the media, as opposed to Mayweather's often-unpleasant one.
--Ali's being infinitely more amusing in his antics than Mayweather.

I could go on, but I think space may confine me eventually...

11:04 AM  
Blogger Kurt said...

What's funny about Ali - as a kid I always rooted against him because he was such a braggart. This was in the '70's during his second reign. I was a huge Joe Frazier fan and also a Kenny Norton fan. I was into the humble slugger types - lol.

But what was surprising to me was how that flipped a little in the second round of his fight with Earnie Shavers - "the Acorn" hurt Ali badly with a few right hands. I remember being jolted by that and actually rooting for Ali to survive and not go out like that - ganked in the second round. I guess once he'd been humbled a little, by eroding skills and a huge puncher, I found him sympathetic.

Ali was definitely polarizing. When you read some of the race propaganda he was spewing - all the way into the mid-70's it's pretty bracing (if you can get your hands on the interview he gave Playboy in the mid-70's - you'll see him argue against the mixing of the races and wanting the gov't to grant black people land in the south so blacks didn't have to live with whites anymore). There were obviously absolutely legitimate reasons to rail against the prevalent racism of the day, but the Nation of Islam took an extreme view.

I don't doubt that some people don't root for Floyd strictly because of his race. Boxing has always been a sport where race and ethnicity are part of what determines a fighters following. Duddy draws the Irish, Cotto the Puerto Ricans, Hatton the Brits, Salita the Jews. Gerry Cooney had a lot of white people interested in boxing who normally wouldn't be interested. I've had more than a few people ask me, when they find out what I do, if any of the fighters I represent are white. I guess that's part of human nature - whether you agree with it or not. My wife, who's black, only watches tennis if Venus or Serena are playing. The only golfer she knows of is Tiger Woods. If some white people don't like Floyd Mayweather because he's flashy, arrogant, highly successful - and black - it is what it is.

For me, I've met him on a few occasions and he's not always been such a cool guy - he's kinda bought into his own bluster. Is he a great fighter - definitely. There are many in the boxing fraternity, whose opinions I respect, that believe he may be one of the best of all-time - that he would have beaten Duran, Whitaker, Armstrong, Chavez - in their prime. He's great - doesn't mean you have to like him though. That's on Floyd.

11:38 AM  
Blogger Chief said...

unsilent beat me to it. That might be the greatest analogy ever to appear on this site.

11:40 AM  
Blogger Kurt said...

Tim - I didn't see your post as I was busy writing mine. We pretty much said the same thing, sorry about that.

11:41 AM  
Anonymous ml said...

as someone who was too young to see much of ali while he was still active I suppose I have been guilty of learning the revisionist version of his history, however it seems the more that you learn, the more you sway towards large's perspective here. Having said that I've just finished reading Taylor Branch's 3 part history of America in the King years, and if my memory serves me correctly, MLK visited Ali (Clay) when he was training in Florida (before vietnam?) on more than one occasion. Not sure if this counts for anything as there are no clear indications that his politics/persona were affected at the time, just thought it seemed worth mentioning.
As for 50/Malcolm X, like you say Malcolm's politics were questionable at best, but I can't help but think that he was a WAY smarter man than 50...

1:56 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home